Skip to text
JonHaines
Thomas Aquinas / Texts and commentaries
 

St. Thomas Aquinas

The Summa Theologica

(Benziger Bros. edition, 1947)
Translated by
Fathers of the English Dominican Province

 

Index  [<< | >>]
Supplement  [<< | >>]
Appendix 2  [<< | >>]
Question: 1  [<< | >>]
Article: 1  [<< | >>]


APPENDIX 2

TWO ARTICLES ON PURGATORY



Whether there is a Purgatory after this life?


  Objection 1: It would seem that there is not a Purgatory after this life. For it is said (Apoc. 14:13): "Blessed are the dead who die in the Lord. From henceforth now, saith the Spirit, that they may rest from their labors." Therefore after this life no cleansing labor awaits those who die in the Lord, nor those who do not die in the Lord, since they cannot be cleansed. Therefore there is no Purgatory after this life.

  Objection 2: Further, as charity is to an eternal reward, so is mortal sin to eternal punishment. Now those who die in mortal sin are forthwith consigned to eternal punishment. Therefore those who die in charity go at once to their reward; and consequently no Purgatory awaits them after this life.

  Objection 3: Further, God Who is supremely merciful is more inclined to reward good than to punish evil. Now just as those who are in the state of charity, do certain evil things which are not deserving of eternal punishment, so those who are in mortal sin, at times perform actions, generically good, which are not deserving of an eternal reward. Therefore since these good actions are not rewarded after this life in those who will be damned, neither should those evil actions be punished after this life. Hence the same conclusion follows.

  On the contrary, It is said (2 Macc. 12:46): "It is a holy and wholesome thought to pray for the dead, that they may be loosed from sins." Now there is no need to pray for the dead who are in heaven, for they are in no need; nor again for those who are in hell, because they cannot be loosed from sins. Therefore after this life, there are some not yet loosed from sins, who can be loosed therefrom; and the like have charity, without which sins cannot be loosed, for "charity covereth all sins" [*Prov. 10:12]. Hence they will not be consigned to everlasting death, since "he that liveth and believeth in Me, shall not die for ever" [*Jn. 11:26]: nor will they obtain glory without being cleansed, because nothing unclean shall obtain it, as stated in the last chapter of the Apocalypse (verse 14). Therefore some kind of cleansing remains after this life.

   Further, Gregory of Nyssa [*De iis qui in fide dormiunt] says: "If one who loves and believes in Christ," has failed to wash away his sins in this life, "he is set free after death by the fire of Purgatory." Therefore there remains some kind of cleansing after this life.

  I answer that, From the conclusions we have drawn above (TP, Question [86], Articles [4],5; XP, Question [12], Article [1]) it is sufficiently clear that there is a Purgatory after this life. For if the debt of punishment is not paid in full after the stain of sin has been washed away by contrition, nor again are venial sins always removed when mortal sins are remitted, and if justice demands that sin be set in order by due punishment, it follows that one who after contrition for his fault and after being absolved, dies before making due satisfaction, is punished after this life. Wherefore those who deny Purgatory speak against the justice of God: for which reason such a statement is erroneous and contrary to faith. Hence Gregory of Nyssa, after the words quoted above, adds: "This we preach, holding to the teaching of truth, and this is our belief; this the universal Church holds, by praying for the dead that they may be loosed from sins." This cannot be understood except as referring to Purgatory: and whosoever resists the authority of the Church, incurs the note of heresy.

  Reply to Objection 1: The authority quoted is speaking of the labor of working for merit, and not of the labor of suffering to be cleansed.

  Reply to Objection 2: Evil has not a perfect cause, but results from each single defect: whereas good arises from one perfect cause, as Dionysius asserts [*Div. Nom. iv, 4]. Hence each defect is an obstacle to the perfection of good; while not every good hinders some consummation of evil, since there is never evil without some good. Consequently venial sin prevents one who has charity from obtaining the perfect good, namely eternal life, until he be cleansed; whereas mortal sin cannot be hindered by some conjoined good from bringing a man forthwith to the extreme of evils.

  Reply to Objection 3: He that falls into mortal sin, deadens all the good he has done before, and what he does, while in mortal sin, is dead: since by offending God he deserves to lose all the good he has from God. Wherefore no reward after this life awaits him who dies in mortal sin, whereas sometimes punishment awaits him who dies in charity, which does not always wash away the sin which it finds, but only that which is contrary to it.


 

Index  [<< | >>]
Supplement  [<< | >>]
Appendix 2  [<< | >>]
Question: 1  [<< | >>]
Article: 2  [<< | >>]


Whether it is the same place where souls are cleansed, and the damned punished?


  Objection 1: It would seem that it is not the same place where souls are cleansed and the damned punished. For the punishment of the damned is eternal, according to Mt. 25:46, "These shall go into everlasting punishment [Vulg.: 'fire']." But the fire of Purgatory is temporary, as the Master says (Sent. iv, D, 21). Therefore the former and the latter are not punished together in the same place: and consequently these places must needs be distinct.

  Objection 2: The punishment of hell is called by various names, as in Ps. 10:7, "Fire and brimstone, and storms of winds," etc., whereas the punishment of Purgatory is called by one name only, namely fire. Therefore they are not punished with the same fire and in the same place.

  Objection 3: Further, Hugh of St. Victor says (De Sacram. ii, 16): "It is probable that they are punished in the very places where they sinned." And Gregory relates (Dial. iv, 40) that Germanus, Bishop of Capua, found Paschasius being cleansed in the baths. Therefore they are not cleansed in the same place as hell, but in this world.

  On the contrary, Gregory says [*The quotation is from St. Augustine (De Civ. Dei i, 8)]: "Even as in the same fire gold glistens and straw smokes, so in the same fire the sinner burns and the elect is cleansed." Therefore the fire of Purgatory is the same as the fire of hell: and hence they are in the same place.

   Further, the holy fathers; before the coming of Christ, were in a more worthy place than that wherein souls are now cleansed after death, since there was no pain of sense there. Yet that place was joined to hell, or the same as hell: otherwise Christ when descending into Limbo would not be said to have descended into hell. Therefore Purgatory is either close to, or the same place as, hell.

  I answer that, Nothing is clearly stated in Scripture about the situation of Purgatory, nor is it possible to offer convincing arguments on this question. It is probable, however, and more in keeping with the statements of holy men and the revelations made to many, that there is a twofold place of Purgatory. one, according to the common law; and thus the place of Purgatory is situated below and in proximity to hell, so that it is the same fire which torments the damned in hell and cleanses the just in Purgatory; although the damned being lower in merit, are to be consigned to a lower place. Another place of Purgatory is according to dispensation: and thus sometimes, as we read, some are punished in various places, either that the living may learn, or that the dead may be succored, seeing that their punishment being made known to the living may be mitigated through the prayers of the Church.

   Some say, however, that according to the common law the place of Purgatory is where man sins. This does not seem probable, since a man may be punished at the same time for sins committed in various places. And others say that according to the common law they are punished above us, because they are between us and God, as regards their state. But this is of no account, for they are not punished for being above us, but for that which is lowest in them, namely sin.

  Reply to Objection 1: The fire of Purgatory is eternal in its substance, but temporary in its cleansing effect.

  Reply to Objection 2: The punishment of hell is for the purpose of affliction, wherefore it is called by the names of things that are wont to afflict us here. But the chief purpose of the punishment of Purgatory is to cleanse us from the remains of sin; and consequently the pain of fire only is ascribed to Purgatory, because fire cleanses and consumes.

  Reply to Objection 3: This argument considers the point of special dispensation and not that of the common law.


This document converted to HTML on Fri Jan 02 19:10:53 1998.

Latin — Supplementum

pr.

Circa Purgatorium quaeruntur octo.

Primo: utrum sit purgatorium post hanc vitam.

Secundo: utrum sit idem locus quo animae purgantur, et quo damnati puniuntur.

Tertio: utrum poena purgatorii excedat omnem poenam temporalem huius vitae.

Quarto: utrum illa poena sit voluntaria.

Quinto: utrum animae in purgatorio per daemones puniantur.

Sexto: utrum per poenam purgatorii expietur peccatum veniale quoad culpam.

Septimo: utrum ignis purgatorius liberet a reatu poenae.

Octavo: utrum ab illa poena unus liberetur alio citius.

a. 1 arg. 1

Ad primum sic proceditur. Videtur quod purgatorium non sit post hanc vitam. Apoc. 14, (13) dicitur: beati mortui qui in Domino moriuntur. Amodo iam, dicit Spiritus, ut requiescant a laboribus suis. Ergo his qui in Domino moriuntur non manet aliquis purgatorius labor post hanc vitam. Nec illis qui non in Domino moriuntur: quia illi purgari non possunt. Ergo purgatorium post hanc vitam non est.

a. 1 arg. 2

Praeterea, sicut se habet caritas ad praemium aeternum, ita peccatum mortale ad supplicium aeternum. Sed decedentes in peccato mortali statim ad supplicium aeternum deportantur. Ergo decedentes in caritate statim ad praemium vadunt. Et ita non manet eis aliquod purgatorium post hanc vitam.

a. 1 arg. 3

Praeterea, Deus, qui est summe misericors, pronior est ad praemiandum bona quam ad puniendum mala. Sed, sicut illi qui sunt in statu caritatis, faciunt aliqua mala quae non sunt digna supplicio aeterno, ita illi qui sunt in peccato mortali, interdum faciunt aliqua bona ex genere, quae non sunt digna praemio aeterno. Ergo, cum illa bona non praemientur in damnandis post hanc vitam, nec illa mala debent post hanc vitam puniri. Et sic idem quod prius.

a. 1 s. c. 1

Sed contra: II Machab. 12, (46) dicitur: sancta et salubris est cogitatio pro defunctis exorare ut a peccatis solvantur. Sed pro defunctis qui sunt in paradiso, non est orandum: quia illi nullo indigent. Nec iterum pro illis qui sunt in inferno: quia illi a peccatis solvi non possunt. Ergo post hanc vitam sunt aliqui a peccatis nondum absoluti qui solvi possunt. Et tales caritatem habent, sine qua non fit peccatorum remissio: quia universa delicta operit caritas, Prov. 10, (12). Unde ad mortem aeternam non devenient: quia qui vivit et credit in me, non morietur in aeternum, Ioan. 11, (26). Nec ad gloriam inducentur nisi purgati: quia nihil immundum ad illam perveniet, ut patet Apoc. Ergo aliqua purgatio restat post hanc vitam.

a. 1 arg. 4

Praeterea, Gregorius Nyssenus dicit: si aliquis Christo amico consentiens in hac vita purgare peccata minus potuerit, post transitum hinc, per purgatorii ignis conflationem expeditur. Ergo post hanc vitam restat aliqua purgatio.

a. 1 co.

Respondeo dicendum quod ex illis quae supra determinata sunt, satis potest constare purgatorium esse post hanc vitam. Si enim, per contritionem deleta culpa, non tollitur ex toto reatus poenae; nec etiam semper venialia, dimissis mortalibus, tolluntur; et iustitia Dei hoc exigit ut peccatum per poenam debitam ordinetur: oportet quod ille qui post contritionem de peccato decedit et absolutionem, ante satisfactionem debitam, quod post hanc vitam puniatur.

Et ideo illi qui purgatorium negant, contra divinam iustitiam loquuntur. Et propter hoc erroneum est, et a fide alienum. Unde Gregorius Nyssenus post praedicta verba subiungit: hoc praedicamus dogma veritatis servantes, et ita credimus.

Hoc etiam universalis Ecclesia tenet, pro defunctis exorans ut a peccatis solvantur: quod non potest nisi de illis qui sunt in purgatorio intelligi. Ecclesiae autem auctoritati quicumque resistit, haeresim incurrit.

a. 1 ad 1

Ad primum ergo dicendum quod auctoritas illa loquitur de labore operationis ad merendum, et non de labore passionis ad purgandum.

a. 1 ad 2

Ad secundum dicendum quod malum non habet causam perfectam, sed ex singularibus defectibus contingit: sed bonum ex una causa perfecta consurgit, ut Dionysius dicit. Et ideo quilibet defectus impedit a perfectione boni, sed non quodlibet bonum impedit consummationem aliquam mali: quia nunquam est malum sine aliquo bono. Et ideo peccatum veniale impedit habentem caritatem ne ad perfectum bonum deveniat, scilicet vitam aeternam, quandiu purgatur. Sed peccatum mortale non potest impediri per aliquod bonum adiunctum quominus statim ad ultimum malorum perducat.

a. 1 ad 3

Ad tertium dicendum quod ille qui in peccatum mortale incidit, omnia bona ante acta mortificat, et quae in peccato mortali existens facit, mortua sunt: quia ipse, Deum offendens, omnia bona meretur amittere, quae a Deo habet. Unde ei qui in peccato mortali decedit, non manet aliquod praemium post hanc vitam: sicut manet aliquando poena ei qui in caritate decedit, quae non semper delet omne malum quod invenit, sed solum hoc quod est sibi contrarium.

a. 2 arg. 1

Ad secundum sic proceditur. Videtur quod non sit idem locus quo animae purgantur, et quo damnati puniuntur. Quia poena damnatorum est aeterna: ut dicitur Matth. 25, (46): ibunt hi in ignem aeternum. Sed purgatorius ignis est temporalis: ut supra Magister dixit. Ergo non simul puniuntur hi et illi eodem igne. Et sic oportet loca esse distincta.

a. 2 arg. 2

Praeterea, poena inferni nominatur pluribus nominibus: ut in Psalmo (10, 7), ignis, sulphur et spiritus procellarum, etc. Sed poena purgatorii non nisi uno nomine nominatur, scilicet ignis. Ergo non eodem igne et eodem loco puniuntur.

a. 2 arg. 3

Praeterea, Hugo de S. Victore dicit: probabile est quod in his locis puniuntur in quibus commiserunt culpam. Gregorius etiam, in Dialogis, narrat quod Germanus, episcopus Capuanus, Paschasium, qui in balneis purgabatur, invenit. Ergo in loco inferni non purgantur, sed in hoc mundo.

a. 2 s. c. 1

Sed contra: Est quod Gregorius dicit, quod, sicut sub eodem igne aurum rutilat et palea fumat, ita sub eodem igne peccator crematur et electus purgatur. Ergo idem est ignis purgatorii et inferni. Et sic in eodem loco sunt.

a. 2 arg. 4

Praeterea, sancti patres ante adventum Christi fuerunt in loco digniori quam sit locus in quo nunc purgantur animae post mortem: quia non erat ibi aliqua poena sensibilis. Sed locus ille erat coniunctus inferno, vel idem quod infernus: alias Christus, ad limbum descendens, non diceretur ad inferos descendisse. Ergo et purgatorium est in eodem loco, vel iuxta infernum.

a. 2 co.

Respondeo dicendum quod de loco purgatorii non invenitur aliquid expresse determinatum in Scriptura, nec rationes possunt ad hoc efficaces induci. Tamen probabiliter, et secundum quod consonat magis Sanctorum dictis et revelationi factae multis, locus purgatorii est duplex. Unus secundum legem communem. Et sic locus purgatorii est locus inferior inferno coniunctus, ita quod idem ignis sit qui damnatos cruciat in inferno, et qui iustos in purgatorio purgat: quamvis damnati, secundum quod sunt inferiores merito, et loco inferiores ordinandi sint. Alius est locus purgatorii secundum dispensationem. Et sic quandoque in diversis locis aliqui puniti leguntur: vel ad vivorum instructionem; vel ad mortuorum subventionem, ut viventibus eorum poena innotescens per suffragia Ecclesiae mitigaretur.

Quidam tamen dicunt quod secundum legem communem locus purgatorii est ubi homo peccat. Quod non videtur probabile: quia simul potest homo puniri pro peccatis quae in diversis locis commisit.

Quidam vero dicunt quod puniuntur supra nos secundum legem communem: quia sunt medii inter nos et Deum quantum ad statum. Sed hoc nihil est. Quia non puniuntur pro eo quod supra nos sunt: sed pro eo quod est infimum in eis, scilicet peccatum.

a. 2 ad 1

Ad primum ergo dicendum quod ignis purgatorius est aeternus quantum ad substantiam, sed temporalis quantum ad effectum purgationis.

a. 2 ad 2

Ad secundum dicendum quod poena inferni est ad affligendum: et ideo nominatur ab omnibus illis quae hic nos affligere consueverunt. Sed poena purgatorii est principaliter ad purgandum reliquias peccati. Et ideo sola poena ignis purgatorio attribuitur: quia ignis habet purgare et consumere.

a. 2 ad 3

Ad tertium dicendum quod ratio illa procedit secundum dispensationem, et non secundum legem communem.